Equipoise results alone

Depending on the dosage, diet and your genetics, the results you can expect to see with winstrol can greatly differ. Some people can do a winstrol cycle, lose 5% bodyfat and gain 10 lbs of lean muscle and look amazing,while others can see little to no fat loss and very little msucle gain, genetics play a big role but diet is the most important factor, no matter what steroids you use you cant expect good results if you arent eating properly. You need to eat tons of protein everyday, your muscle needs protein to grow and cant grow from nothing. Dont expect amazing results from winstrol if you arent willing to work hard.

Dave, let me clear the air here on some of the confusion… I recommend the 1 vial cycle for someone who is either A. younger or either B. already has high levels of natural testosterone. Now, the typical middle aged male who already had declining levels of natural testosterone COULD go with 500 mg/wk for 10 wks. Recovery is recovery at that point and if you’re going to do it then I see nothing wrong with getting the most out of that first cycle. But what you have to realize is a male with a starting level of high average test levels can still yield the same benefits of someone who is middle range-low end of normal and uses 500mg/wk of test. In either case the person can still gain a solid 20 lbs of muscle from either 1 or 2 vials, the determining factor on this is what they were at to begin with

Thus, the question of IVUS versus OCT is wrong and, in fact, belies the true conundrum. Although there are clear differences between the two technologies—resolution and surface detail favoring OCT, penetration and media-to-media sizing favoring IVUS, fine details favoring OCT, the bulk of clinical data favoring IVUS—better questions are IVUS or OCT versus angiography alone and why these technologies are so underutilized given the evidence that has been presented in both of our cases and the fact that the major determinants of optimal stent implantation can be assessed better by either IVUS or OCT than by angiography alone.

Equipoise results alone

equipoise results alone


equipoise results aloneequipoise results aloneequipoise results aloneequipoise results aloneequipoise results alone